March 28th, 2002

I don't use much of the copyrighted material that the Entertainment Industry wants to sell. I watch very few movies (probably 10 a year); I watch very little TV (1-2 hours a week); and I don't listen to much music (ten pieces a month). So, I'm not your average "consumer" of entertainment media.

Why would someone like me be upset about the recent maneuvering of the entertainment industry? Simply put, they are attempting to use the law to reduce the functionality of my computers.

Ostensibly, the thinking behind the proposed bill — the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act — is that if more movies were online, more people would have highspeed Internet access. That is, couch potatos would look to the glow of their 15 inch monitor rather than their 56 inch TV set for movies if more were online. The reality is that people don't seem to have a real desire for "on-demand" movies — attempts have been made for the past ten years to create a market for the idea — so this facade is just that: a lie.

The bill would not only reduce the functionality of any new computers, it has the potential to outlaw free and open-source software. In this sense, it is again a fight of the greedy capitalist against the people.

My cousin (got a website Jeremy?) and I have begun playing Spy-vs-Spy with GnuPG. And now there is an article in Salon about the demise of PGP and the rise of GnuPG.

My brother Mert even has a real use for encryption — passing information back and forth about sensitive evangelistic efforts in closed Muslim societies.

The GnuPG article talks about ease of use being the primary concern as users move from PGP to the free GnuPG. I would whole-heartedly agree. I wouldn't think of using GnuPG if I didn't have simple tools to use it with. Since I use Mailcrypt, I don't have to worry about arcane commands and extra steps to use encryption. Just select a menu item or hit a couple of keys and the mail is encrypted or signed.